Dear FDEP,
I am writing today to express my disapproval of the plans to
revise the land use of Jonathan Dickinson State Park (JDSP). I disagree with
this plan based on concerns for ecology, concerns with projected use of the
proposed lands, and concerns about the future of the park.
Ecological Concerns
In heavily developed South Florida, it is rare to find a plot
of land with minimal development. As is stated on the state park website, the
proposed development areas is part of a series of dune habitat of the Atlantic
Coastal Ridge. To quote the JDSP website:
“ The
hills found in the eastern portion of the park adjacent to US highway 1 are some
of the only hills found in the area and many of the plants and animals
which grow upon them are unique to the desert like conditions of the dunes. The
plant community which occupies these sand dunes, the Sand Pine Scrub, is a
disappearing habitat which is home to plants and animals found nowhere else
in the world. Many of these species are endangered and some are specific
only to Jonathan Dickinson State Park and Florida.”
Based on your own description, this is fragile and rare
ecosystem which provides a safe-haven for endangered species. The stated
goal of the Florida State Parks “is to create a sense of place by
showing park visitors the best of Florida's diverse natural and cultural sites.”
I fail to see how building of a golf course at the expense of a natural “disappearing habitat” aligns with the goal of the Florida State Parks.
Outside of the initial environmental impacts of constructing a golf course by
removing scrub habitat, I have concerns about lingering effects related to maintenance
of the proposed course. Regular pesticide and fertilizer use to maintain golf
courses pose a threat to the water systems and surrounding habitats which
surround the proposed course. Jonathan Dickinson
State Park is a natural enclave along the South Florida Coastal Corridor and I
fear that this refuge for the natural ecosystem would experience much harm by
this plan.
Use of Proposed Land Concerns
On top of the environmental concerns, I fear that the
proposed design will not be beneficial due to the mount use of a golf course in
the state park. South Florida is no strange to golf courses and with plenty of
options, I fear the amount of impact in building a golf course would exceed the
actual use of the course. There are 7 other golf courses within a 5 mile radius
of t he main park entrance (and plenty more beyond this arbitrary distance).
There is no shortage of options for both public and private golf courses in the
area. A stated objective for developing a golf course in JDSP is to “Increase
public access to recreational golfing opportunities. ” To be frank, this
objective is laughable due to the aforementioned concentration of golf courses
in the area.
I am no stranger to golf and do not mean to vilify the idea
of golf courses. I am the son of a PGA Professional, I grew up playing golf,
and I enjoy playing it. It sounds miserable to play golf in a field of sand
dunes marked by the scrub habitat. To make a suitable course, significant amounts
of soil would have to be moved into the park and this does not seem to align with
goal to be “developed in harmony with the surrounding natural environments” as
stated in the Conceptual Land Use Plan.
One big concern that I have is that the course will be developed
and then it will be underutilized by park goers. Clearing the natural habitat
and then not getting return for doing so seems likely to me. Though never stated in documents, I speculate
that an aim of this development is also to bring a new demographic into the
park to help with economic revenue. While I cannot fault a park for trying to
boost capital, I do not expect that this would be effective. As previously
stated, there are plenty of golf course options already available. Additionally,
a public entity cannot charge too much for a round of golf or else the “everyday
man” would not be able to afford it and that would not align with the mission
of Florid State Parks. Conversely, a golf course require significantly more
maintenance than natural land and there are costs associated with this. I do
not see this as a viable long term strategy to attract people to the park
(although, again, this is just speculation on my part). In my humble opinion, a
better use of these funds would be to fix the reported safety concerns of the
Hobe Mountain Observation Tower.
Future of the Park Concerns
Finally, I have concerns about what building a golf course
would mean for the future of the park. Building a golf course is the very
embodiment of disrupting the natural ecosystem. Tearing down natural vegetation
of “disappearing habitats” and replacing
it with more “aesthetic” vegetation that needs to be groomed, manicured, and irrigated
feels like a threat to the conservation of a rare and “disappearing habitat.”
My question is what will the next thing be? Draining a lake to build a water
park? Bulldozing hiking trails to put raceways? Replacing the educational visitor
center with a shopping plaza? These may sound extreme, but they are all exist
in the same principle of appealing to more people at the expense of the natural
land. To quote the great Joni Mitchell, “They paved paradise and put up a
Parking lot” and I fear that is the future of JDSP.
I am writing this letter because I care about the park.
Jonathan Dickinson State Park was “my state park” growing up. It is where I first
learned to canoe with my family. It is what captivated me with the mythos of historic
“Old Florida” at Trapper Nelson’s home
and the endless scrub. Hikes in the scrub and along the Loxahatchee River
inspired me to pursue a PhD in the earth sciences and pursue a career as a
hydrologist. I can remember every camping trip with my family and my Boy Scout
Troop there. I remember seeing the view atop the Hobe Mountain Observation Tower
and thinking I was transported to the Serengeti or some far away land. I remember
learning about the importance of conserving nature, managing the land properly,
and respecting wildlife. Jonathan Dickinson State Park is a special place and I
would hate to see it become just another overdeveloped plot of land.
I hope that you will reconsider the amendment to the Unit Management
Plan
.
Thank you for sharing these thoughts. I totally agree that there is no need to stress and further impact these lands that are treasured.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your amazing comments. I support everything you said and hope the powers that be in this insane proposal listen.
ReplyDeleteYou speak for a great number of us. I cried as I read the last paragraph as I, too, have enjoyed so many hours in Jonathan Dickinson state Park - I always take visitors there to show them how very special and beautiful our environment is. Thank you for standing up for us and for future generations.
ReplyDeleteBravo and thank you for your eloquent and passionate letter. I'm a native Floridian of 68 years and also grew up visiting and enjoying JD State Park. This is one of the most horrific ideas I've ever heard in my life and it absolutely cannot happen. It just can't.
ReplyDeleteEven if this horrible plan is eventually withdrawn, we must find out who was responsible for it in the first place? Who drafted it and when? Were government-in-the-sunshine laws broken? Who was going to benefit financially? Who's behind it and why? I have a strong suspicion that this is only the start of our current state government's attack on the Florida environment.
ReplyDelete